| Title |
Desecuritisation as a soft power strategy: the Belt and Road Initiative, European fragmentation and China’s normative influence in Central-Eastern Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Asia Europe Journal, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10308-019-00561-3 |
| Authors |
Małgorzata Jakimów |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Poland | 3 | 19% |
| Czechia | 3 | 19% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 31 | 39% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,663,875
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Asia Europe Journal
#8
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,030
of 353,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Europe Journal
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them