| Title |
A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Implant Breast Reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-07548-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meghan R. Flanagan, Emily C. Zabor, Anya Romanoff, Sarah Fuzesi, Michelle Stempel, Babak J. Mehrara, Monica Morrow, Andrea L. Pusic, Mary L. Gemignani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 30% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 49 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,521,481
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#587
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,607
of 360,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#18
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.