↓ Skip to main content

Humanitarian Activities of Interplast Turkiye

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Plastic Surgery, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Humanitarian Activities of Interplast Turkiye
Published in
Annals of Plastic Surgery, November 2016
DOI 10.1097/sap.0000000000000821
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mert Calis, Ali Mubin Aral, Ayse Sencan, Meral Kanbak, brahim Vargel, Figen Ozgur, Deniz Iscen

Abstract

Cleft lip and palate (CL/P) is one of the leading congenital deformities among the world. Children born with CL/P experience problems with feeding, speech, hearing, and dentition. In developed countries, CL/P patients are receiving optimal health care involving multidisciplinary team approach and staged surgical operations, whereas in developing countries, there is severe shortage of both medical and financial sources. To overcome these limitations, humanitarian surgical missions are essential. The aim of this article is to share our experience of humanitarian surgical mission in Uzbekistan consisting of 6 consecutive visits between 2009 and 2014. The series of these humanitarian activities consisting of 6 consecutive visits was organized by the cooperation of Interplast Turkiye and governmental Turkish Coordination and Cooperation Agency. After initial evaluation, triage at the initial setting and prompt anesthesia evaluation among many more of them, 529 patients mostly with cleft, craniofacial, or congenital deformities were operated. The success of this type of mission is not solely based on the expertise of the team members, but also meticulous planning, patient selection, good coordination with the local colleagues and communication. At this point, caregivers attending from a culturally close and similar language-spoken countries will certainly have more advantages in achieving a mission. Volunteer surgical missions for congenital deformities can be an important relief for this burden in developing countries. Nevertheless, training the native surgeons and supporting the plastic surgery foundations in these countries are as important as providing the necessary health care by such humanitarian missions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 22 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Plastic Surgery
#1,848
of 3,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,646
of 317,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Plastic Surgery
#19
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,909 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.