↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenetics of alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogenetics of alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins
Published in
Human Genetics, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00439-016-1655-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Przemyslaw Szafranski, Tomasz Gambin, Avinash V. Dharmadhikari, Kadir Caner Akdemir, Shalini N. Jhangiani, Jennifer Schuette, Nihal Godiwala, Svetlana A. Yatsenko, Jessica Sebastian, Suneeta Madan-Khetarpal, Urvashi Surti, Rosanna G. Abellar, David A. Bateman, Ashley L. Wilson, Melinda H. Markham, Jill Slamon, Fernando Santos-Simarro, María Palomares, Julián Nevado, Pablo Lapunzina, Brian Hon-Yin Chung, Wai-Lap Wong, Yoyo Wing Yiu Chu, Gary Tsz Kin Mok, Eitan Kerem, Joel Reiter, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Scott A. Anderson, David R. Kelly, Joseph Shieh, Taryn C. Rosenthal, Kristin Scheible, Laurie Steiner, M. Anwar Iqbal, Margaret L. McKinnon, Sara Jane Hamilton, Kamilla Schlade-Bartusiak, Dawn English, Glenda Hendson, Elizabeth R. Roeder, Thomas S. DeNapoli, Rebecca Okashah Littlejohn, Daynna J. Wolff, Carol L. Wagner, Alison Yeung, David Francis, Elizabeth K. Fiorino, Morris Edelman, Joyce Fox, Denise A. Hayes, Sandra Janssens, Elfride De Baere, Björn Menten, Anne Loccufier, Lieve Vanwalleghem, Philippe Moerman, Yves Sznajer, Amy S. Lay, Jennifer L. Kussmann, Jasneek Chawla, Diane J. Payton, Gael E. Phillips, Erwin Brosens, Dick Tibboel, Annelies de Klein, Isabelle Maystadt, Richard Fisher, Neil Sebire, Alison Male, Maya Chopra, Jason Pinner, Girvan Malcolm, Gregory Peters, Susan Arbuckle, Melissa Lees, Zoe Mead, Oliver Quarrell, Richard Sayers, Martina Owens, Charles Shaw-Smith, Janet Lioy, Eileen McKay, Nicole de Leeuw, Ilse Feenstra, Liesbeth Spruijt, Frances Elmslie, Timothy Thiruchelvam, Carlos A. Bacino, Claire Langston, James R. Lupski, Partha Sen, Edwina Popek, Paweł Stankiewicz

Abstract

Alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins (ACDMPV) is a lethal lung developmental disorder caused by heterozygous point mutations or genomic deletion copy-number variants (CNVs) of FOXF1 or its upstream enhancer involving fetal lung-expressed long noncoding RNA genes LINC01081 and LINC01082. Using custom-designed array comparative genomic hybridization, Sanger sequencing, whole exome sequencing (WES), and bioinformatic analyses, we studied 22 new unrelated families (20 postnatal and two prenatal) with clinically diagnosed ACDMPV. We describe novel deletion CNVs at the FOXF1 locus in 13 unrelated ACDMPV patients. Together with the previously reported cases, all 31 genomic deletions in 16q24.1, pathogenic for ACDMPV, for which parental origin was determined, arose de novo with 30 of them occurring on the maternally inherited chromosome 16, strongly implicating genomic imprinting of the FOXF1 locus in human lungs. Surprisingly, we have also identified four ACDMPV families with the pathogenic variants in the FOXF1 locus that arose on paternal chromosome 16. Interestingly, a combination of the severe cardiac defects, including hypoplastic left heart, and single umbilical artery were observed only in children with deletion CNVs involving FOXF1 and its upstream enhancer. Our data demonstrate that genomic imprinting at 16q24.1 plays an important role in variable ACDMPV manifestation likely through long-range regulation of FOXF1 expression, and may be also responsible for key phenotypic features of maternal uniparental disomy 16. Moreover, in one family, WES revealed a de novo missense variant in ESRP1, potentially implicating FGF signaling in the etiology of ACDMPV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Librarian 4 5%
Other 19 24%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,219,447
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#498
of 3,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,801
of 306,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.