You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neo-Liberal Methods of Labour Repression: Privatised Violence and Dispossessive Litigation in Korea
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Contemporary Asia, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1080/00472336.2019.1663552 |
Authors |
Yoonkyung Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 14% |
Lecturer | 2 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 5 | 36% |
Psychology | 2 | 14% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#899,655
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Contemporary Asia
#17
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,828
of 342,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Contemporary Asia
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.