| Title |
Trust in genomic data sharing among members of the general public in the UK, USA, Canada and Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Genetics, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00439-019-02062-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Milne, Katherine I. Morley, Heidi Howard, Emilia Niemiec, Dianne Nicol, Christine Critchley, Barbara Prainsack, Danya Vears, James Smith, Claire Steed, Paul Bevan, Jerome Atutornu, Lauren Farley, Peter Goodhand, Adrian Thorogood, Erika Kleiderman, Anna Middleton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 24% |
| Australia | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| South Africa | 2 | 7% |
| Belgium | 2 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#715,179
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#37
of 2,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,082
of 353,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.