↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of airborn multiwalled carbon nanotubes in a manufactoring environment

Overview of attention for article published in Nanotechnologies in Russia, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of airborn multiwalled carbon nanotubes in a manufactoring environment
Published in
Nanotechnologies in Russia, March 2016
DOI 10.1134/s1995078016010055
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. M. Fatkhutdinova, T. O. Khaliullin, R. R. Zalyalov, A. G. Tkachev, M. E. Birch, A. A. Shvedova

Abstract

This study was carried out in a factory producing multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) by the catalytic chemical vapor deposition method in a pyrolysis reactor. Air samples of the personal breathing areas were collected simultaneously on mixed cellulose ester filters, for analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and on high-purity quartz filters for thermal-optical analysis of elemental carbon (EC). It is found that the production of MWCNTs is accompanied by the release of the MWCNT structures in the air of different working zones. The concentration of respirable aerosol in the personal breathing areas, averaged over an 8-hour period, ranges from 0.54 to 6.11 μg/m(3) based on EC. Airborne MWCNTs were found in the form of agglomerates that range in size from about 1 to 10 μm. These data are consistent with measurements in different plants by two other international groups (from the United States and Sweden) using similar methodology (TEM in combination with EC analysis). In the absence of convincing data on the potential health risks of MWCNTs, and following the principle of reasonable precautions, preventive measures should be taken to minimize exposure to these materials.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Researcher 3 27%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,478,822
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Nanotechnologies in Russia
#10
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,702
of 300,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanotechnologies in Russia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them