| Title |
Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-019-01189-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joao Beleboni Marques, Darren James Paul, Phil Graham-Smith, Paul James Read |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 19% |
| Spain | 6 | 14% |
| Qatar | 3 | 7% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 72% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 259 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 84 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 77 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 12% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 85 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,160,121
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#994
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,462
of 353,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#23
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.