↓ Skip to main content

Estimating dyskinesia severity in Parkinson’s disease by using a waist-worn sensor: concurrent validity study

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating dyskinesia severity in Parkinson’s disease by using a waist-worn sensor: concurrent validity study
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-49798-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero, Carlos Pérez-López, Albert Samà, Daniel Rodríguez-Martín, Sheila Alcaine, Berta Mestre, Paola Quispe, Benedetta Giuliani, Gabriel Vainstein, Patrick Browne, Dean Sweeney, Leo R. Quinlan, J. Manuel Moreno Arostegui, Àngels Bayes, Hadas Lewy, Alberto Costa, Roberta Annicchiarico, Timothy Counihan, Gearòid Ò. Laighin, Joan Cabestany

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 20 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 18%
Computer Science 6 12%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Psychology 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,581,198
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#79,123
of 125,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,668
of 342,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,158
of 3,378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.