↓ Skip to main content

Denisovan, modern human and mouse TNFAIP3 alleles tune A20 phosphorylation and immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Immunology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Denisovan, modern human and mouse TNFAIP3 alleles tune A20 phosphorylation and immunity
Published in
Nature Immunology, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41590-019-0492-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan W. Zammit, Owen M. Siggs, Paul E. Gray, Keisuke Horikawa, David B. Langley, Stacey N. Walters, Stephen R. Daley, Claudia Loetsch, Joanna Warren, Jin Yan Yap, Daniele Cultrone, Amanda Russell, Elisabeth K. Malle, Jeanette E. Villanueva, Mark J. Cowley, Velimir Gayevskiy, Marcel E. Dinger, Robert Brink, David Zahra, Geeta Chaudhri, Gunasegaran Karupiah, Belinda Whittle, Carla Roots, Edward Bertram, Michiko Yamada, Yogesh Jeelall, Anselm Enders, Benjamin E. Clifton, Peter D. Mabbitt, Colin J. Jackson, Susan R. Watson, Craig N. Jenne, Lewis L. Lanier, Tim Wiltshire, Matthew H. Spitzer, Garry P. Nolan, Frank Schmitz, Alan Aderem, Benjamin T. Porebski, Ashley M. Buckle, Derek W. Abbott, John B. Ziegler, Maria E. Craig, Paul Benitez-Aguirre, Juliana Teo, Stuart G. Tangye, Cecile King, Melanie Wong, Murray P. Cox, Wilson Phung, Jia Tang, Wendy Sandoval, Ingrid E. Wertz, Daniel Christ, Christopher C. Goodnow, Shane T. Grey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 32 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 214. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2022.
All research outputs
#181,660
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from Nature Immunology
#104
of 4,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,593
of 353,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Immunology
#3
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.