↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1743-8977-5-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tina M Sager, C Kommineni, Vincent Castranova

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Environmental Science 7 7%
Materials Science 7 7%
Engineering 7 7%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2009.
All research outputs
#7,478,822
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#241
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,692
of 166,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.