Title |
Surgical technique used in the UK for native tissue anterior pelvic organ prolapse repair (VaST)
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00192-019-04103-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emily Fairclough, Julia Segar, Jenny Myers, Anthony Smith, Fiona Reid |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 44% |
Other | 2 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 56% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
Design | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#2,449
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,377
of 351,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#39
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.