↓ Skip to main content

Transverse patterns and length-scale selection in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers with a large square aperture

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Physics B, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Transverse patterns and length-scale selection in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers with a large square aperture
Published in
Applied Physics B, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00340-005-2012-1
Authors

M. Schulz-Ruhtenberg, I.V. Babushkin, N.A. Loiko, T. Ackemann, K.F. Huang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,214,995 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physics B
#408
of 1,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,000
of 62,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physics B
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,214,995 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.