↓ Skip to main content

Tempos and modes of collectivity in the history of life

Overview of attention for article published in Theory in Biosciences, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Tempos and modes of collectivity in the history of life
Published in
Theory in Biosciences, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12064-019-00303-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas H. Erwin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,688,569
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Theory in Biosciences
#122
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,961
of 314,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory in Biosciences
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.