You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating heterogeneous brokerage: New conceptual and methodological approaches and their application to multi-level environmental governance networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Networks, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.08.002 |
| Authors |
Matthew Hamilton, Jacob Hileman, Örjan Bodin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Colombia | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Argentina | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 59% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 41% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,704,193
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Social Networks
#118
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,250
of 410,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Networks
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.