Title |
Retrospectively acquired cohort study to evaluate the long-term impact of two different treatment strategies on disability outcomes in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RE.LO.DI.MS): data from the Italian MS Register
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neurology, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00415-019-09531-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Damiano Paolicelli, Giuseppe Lucisano, Alessia Manni, Carlo Avolio, Simona Bonavita, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Marco Capobianco, Eleonora Cocco, Antonella Conte, Giovanna De Luca, Francesca De Robertis, Claudio Gasperini, Maurizia Gatto, Paola Gazzola, Giacomo Lus, Antonio Iaffaldano, Pietro Iaffaldano, Davide Maimone, Giulia Mallucci, Giorgia T. Maniscalco, Girolama A. Marfia, Francesco Patti, Ilaria Pesci, Carlo Pozzilli, Marco Rovaris, Giuseppe Salemi, Marco Salvetti, Daniele Spitaleri, Rocco Totaro, Mauro Zaffaroni, Giancarlo Comi, Maria Pia Amato, Maria Trojano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 26% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 21% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 21% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,031,603
of 24,618,075 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,967
of 4,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,672
of 347,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#66
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,075 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.