↓ Skip to main content

The Effectiveness and Safety of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: a Comprehensive Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
The Effectiveness and Safety of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: a Comprehensive Literature Review
Published in
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40141-019-00246-3
Authors

Quinn Tate, Aaron Conger, Taylor Burnham, Daniel M. Cushman, Richard Kendall, Byron Schneider, Zachary L. McCormick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 12 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 13 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,924,782
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
#82
of 158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,954
of 340,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 158 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.