| Title |
Hemodynamic Optimization in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Should We Aim for dP/dtmax or Stroke Work?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.05.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alwin Zweerink, Odette A E Salden, Wouter M van Everdingen, Gerben J de Roest, Peter M van de Ven, Maarten J Cramer, Pieter A Doevendans, Albert C van Rossum, Kevin Vernooy, Frits W Prinzen, Mathias Meine, Cornelis P Allaart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 61% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,286,343
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#1,201
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,638
of 358,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#36
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.