You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pharmacist-led academic detailing improves statin therapy prescribing for Malaysian patients with type 2 diabetes: Quasi-experimental design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0220458 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed Hassan Elnaem, Mohamad Haniki Nik Mohamed, Hasniza Zaman Huri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 32% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,301,826
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#106,275
of 197,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,485
of 343,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,309
of 2,512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.