| Title |
“Why throw away something useful?”: Attitudes and opinions of people treated for bipolar disorder and their relatives on organ and tissue donation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell and Tissue Banking, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10561-016-9601-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolina S. Padoan, Lucas F. Garcia, Aline A. Rodrigues, Lucas M. Patusco, Mariana V. Atz, Flavio Kapczinski, José R. Goldim, Pedro V. S. Magalhães |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,604,565
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Banking
#49
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,374
of 418,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Banking
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them