You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2012.347 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heikki Joensuu, Mikael Eriksson, Kirsten Sundby Hall, Jörg T. Hartmann, Daniel Pink, Jochen Schütte, Giuliano Ramadori, Peter Hohenberger, Justus Duyster, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Marcus Schlemmer, Sebastian Bauer, Eva Wardelmann, Maarit Sarlomo-Rikala, Bengt Nilsson, Harri Sihto, Odd R. Monge, Petri Bono, Raija Kallio, Aki Vehtari, Mika Leinonen, Thor Alvegård, Peter Reichardt |
| Abstract |
Synthetic arteriovenous grafts, an important option for hemodialysis vascular access, are prone to recurrent stenosis and thrombosis. Supplementation with fish oils has theoretical appeal for preventing these outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Finland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Honduras | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 323 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 21% |
| Other | 51 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 74 | 22% |
| Unknown | 53 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 216 | 64% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 66 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,723,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#11,604
of 36,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,370
of 175,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#76
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.