↓ Skip to main content

Gambling and Social Cognition: a Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Addiction Reports, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Gambling and Social Cognition: a Systematic Review
Published in
Current Addiction Reports, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40429-019-00280-0
Authors

Elodie Hurel, Gaëlle Challet-Bouju, Nicolas Bukowski, Emeline Eyzop, Marie Grall-Bronnec

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,692,168
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Current Addiction Reports
#256
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,672
of 313,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Addiction Reports
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.