| Title |
The role of S100 genes in breast cancer progression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-010-0137-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eadaoin McKiernan, Enda W. McDermott, Dennis Evoy, John Crown, Michael J. Duffy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,714,138
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#158
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,350
of 181,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.