↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Poor evidence to guide chronic pain treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Poor evidence to guide chronic pain treatment
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, July 2018
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.69538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen N Thompson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,581,703
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#8,450
of 8,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,553
of 330,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#118
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.