| Title |
Prospective analysis of circulating metabolites and breast cancer in EPIC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1408-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mathilde His, Vivian Viallon, Laure Dossus, Audrey Gicquiau, David Achaintre, Augustin Scalbert, Pietro Ferrari, Isabelle Romieu, N. Charlotte Onland-Moret, Elisabete Weiderpass, Christina C. Dahm, Kim Overvad, Anja Olsen, Anne Tjønneland, Agnès Fournier, Joseph A. Rothwell, Gianluca Severi, Tilman Kühn, Renée T. Fortner, Heiner Boeing, Antonia Trichopoulou, Anna Karakatsani, Georgia Martimianaki, Giovanna Masala, Sabina Sieri, Rosario Tumino, Paolo Vineis, Salvatore Panico, Carla H. van Gils, Therese H. Nøst, Torkjel M. Sandanger, Guri Skeie, J. Ramón Quirós, Antonio Agudo, Maria-Jose Sánchez, Pilar Amiano, José María Huerta, Eva Ardanaz, Julie A. Schmidt, Ruth C. Travis, Elio Riboli, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Sofia Christakoudi, Marc J. Gunter, Sabina Rinaldi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 35% |
| Spain | 4 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,378,810
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,529
of 3,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,851
of 345,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#18
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.