| Title |
Enhancing shared decision making about discontinuation of antidepressant medication: a concept-mapping study in primary and secondary mental health care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x706001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolien Wentink, Marloes J Huijbers, Peter Lbj Lucassen, Annoek van der Gouw, Cornelis Kramers, Jan Spijker, Anne Em Speckens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 60% |
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Psychology | 6 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,947,506
of 24,353,295 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,996
of 4,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,746
of 348,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#49
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,353,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.