You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experiences of carers managing childhood eczema and their views on its treatment: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp12x636083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miriam Santer, Hana Burgess, Lucy Yardley, Steven Ersser, Sue Lewis-Jones, Ingrid Muller, Catherine Hugh, Paul Little |
| Abstract |
Childhood eczema causes significant impact on quality of life for some families, yet non-concordance with treatment is common. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 69% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,551,471
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#777
of 4,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,867
of 162,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#5
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.