↓ Skip to main content

Scaling up innovative learning in mathematics: exploring the effect of different professional development approaches on teacher knowledge, beliefs, and instructional practice

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Studies in Mathematics, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Scaling up innovative learning in mathematics: exploring the effect of different professional development approaches on teacher knowledge, beliefs, and instructional practice
Published in
Educational Studies in Mathematics, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10649-019-09895-6
Authors

Daniel J. Heck, Courtney L. Plumley, Despina A. Stylianou, Adrienne A. Smith, Gwendolyn Moffett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 28 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 29%
Mathematics 12 16%
Arts and Humanities 5 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 34 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,172,976
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#454
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,587
of 350,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.