| Title |
Recommendations for sepsis management in resource-limited settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2468-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin W. Dünser, Emir Festic, Arjen Dondorp, Niranjan Kissoon, Tsenddorj Ganbat, Arthur Kwizera, Rashan Haniffa, Tim Baker, Marcus J. Schultz, Global Intensive Care Working Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine |
| Abstract |
To provide clinicians practicing in resource-limited settings with a framework to improve the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric and adult patients with sepsis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Thailand | 1 | 13% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| South Africa | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 337 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 15% |
| Researcher | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 39 | 11% |
| Other | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 98 | 28% |
| Unknown | 58 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 201 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Unknown | 72 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,638,215
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,206
of 5,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,228
of 259,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.