| Title |
Follow-Up Assessment of Health Consequences after a Chlorine Release from a Train Derailment—Graniteville, SC, 2005
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Toxicology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13181-010-0130-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Anne Duncan, Daniel Drociuk, Amy Belflower-Thomas, David Van Sickle, James J. Gibson, Claire Youngblood, W. Randolph Daley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,478,822
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#436
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,373
of 183,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.