↓ Skip to main content

Perinatal Periods of Risk: Analytic Preparation and Phase 1 Analytic Methods for Investigating Feto-Infant Mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Perinatal Periods of Risk: Analytic Preparation and Phase 1 Analytic Methods for Investigating Feto-Infant Mortality
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10995-010-0625-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

William M. Sappenfield, Magda G. Peck, Carol S. Gilbert, Vera R. Haynatzka, Thomas Bryant

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Peru 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 33%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Psychology 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2011.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#839
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,972
of 96,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.