↓ Skip to main content

A simple method for settlement evaluation of loess–pile foundation

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Geotechnical Journal, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A simple method for settlement evaluation of loess–pile foundation
Published in
Canadian Geotechnical Journal, December 2018
DOI 10.1139/cgj-2017-0690
Authors

Xin Jin, Tie-Hang Wang, Wen-Chieh Cheng, Yang Luo, Annan Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 54%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Geotechnical Journal
#1,181
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,764
of 444,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Geotechnical Journal
#27
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.