↓ Skip to main content

塩湖かん水からのリチウム回収を目的としたλ-MnO2 系吸着剤の開発

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of MMIJ, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
塩湖かん水からのリチウム回収を目的としたλ-MnO2 系吸着剤の開発
Published in
Journal of MMIJ, September 2019
DOI 10.2473/journalofmmij.135.83
Authors

高野 雅俊, 浅野 聡, 西浜 章平, 吉塚 和治

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,944,320
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Journal of MMIJ
#105
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,579
of 362,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of MMIJ
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.