↓ Skip to main content

Comfort and patient-centred care without excessive sedation: the eCASH concept

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
51 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
347 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
616 Mendeley
Title
Comfort and patient-centred care without excessive sedation: the eCASH concept
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4297-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Louis Vincent, Yahya Shehabi, Timothy S. Walsh, Pratik P. Pandharipande, Jonathan A. Ball, Peter Spronk, Dan Longrois, Thomas Strøm, Giorgio Conti, Georg-Christian Funk, Rafael Badenes, Jean Mantz, Claudia Spies, Jukka Takala

Abstract

We propose an integrated and adaptable approach to improve patient care and clinical outcomes through analgesia and light sedation, initiated early during an episode of critical illness and as a priority of care. This strategy, which may be regarded as an evolution of the Pain, Agitation and Delirium guidelines, is conveyed in the mnemonic eCASH-early Comfort using Analgesia, minimal Sedatives and maximal Humane care. eCASH aims to establish optimal patient comfort with minimal sedation as the default presumption for intensive care unit (ICU) patients in the absence of recognised medical requirements for deeper sedation. Effective pain relief is the first priority for implementation of eCASH: we advocate flexible multimodal analgesia designed to minimise use of opioids. Sedation is secondary to pain relief and where possible should be based on agents that can be titrated to a prespecified target level that is subject to regular review and adjustment; routine use of benzodiazepines should be minimised. From the outset, the objective of sedation strategy is to eliminate the use of sedatives at the earliest medically justifiable opportunity. Effective analgesia and minimal sedation contribute to the larger aims of eCASH by facilitating promotion of sleep, early mobilization strategies and improved communication of patients with staff and relatives, all of which may be expected to assist rehabilitation and avoid isolation, confusion and possible long-term psychological complications of an ICU stay. eCASH represents a new paradigm for patient-centred care in the ICU. Some organizational challenges to the implementation of eCASH are identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 616 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 613 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 12%
Other 72 12%
Student > Bachelor 56 9%
Researcher 47 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 8%
Other 166 27%
Unknown 152 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 230 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 137 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Unspecified 9 1%
Neuroscience 7 1%
Other 43 7%
Unknown 180 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#783,642
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#740
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,835
of 319,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.