↓ Skip to main content

Investigation of Scents on Cheeks and Foreheads of Large Felines in Connection to the Facial Marking Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Investigation of Scents on Cheeks and Foreheads of Large Felines in Connection to the Facial Marking Behavior
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10886-012-0075-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena A. Soini, Susan U. Linville, Donald Wiesler, Amanda L. Posto, David R. Williams, Milos V. Novotny

Abstract

We investigated head- and cheek-rubbing behavior in four species of large felines, lions (Leo panther), leopards (Panthera pardus), tigers (Panthera tigris), and cougars (Puma concolor), in captivity. Preliminary behavioral observations found that lions and tigers, but not leopards and cougars, showed behavioral responses to cardboard rubbing samples from head and cheek areas from conspecific felines, compared to the blank cardboard controls. In this context, surface samples on the facial areas of each species were collected to analyze volatile organic compounds that could be involved in the facial marking of felines. Previously developed stir bar surface sampling methodology was used. From all cheek and forehead samples, 100 volatile organic compounds were identified or tentatively identified. Among these, 41 have been previously reported to be present in feline urine and marking secretions. Several new compounds were identified on facial surfaces. Some of the compounds showed substantial quantitative differences among the species. One compound, that has not been reported previously in mammals, 3-acetamidofuran, was found in all investigated species. It was synthesized and tested for behavioral responses. No responses were elicited in a preliminary test. Future research will test other potential signaling compounds and their mixtures for ability to elicit behavioral responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 113 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 23%
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Other 10 8%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 60%
Environmental Science 19 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,750,112
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#562
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,383
of 156,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.