| Title |
Feasibility of community-based HIV self-screening in South Africa: a demonstration project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7122-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Limakatso Lebina, Ntombexolo Seatlholo, Noah Taruberekera, Mopo Radebe, Anthony Kinghorn, Tessa Meyer, Miriam Mhazo, Kennedy Otwombe, Khuthadzo Hlongwane, Ashley Ringane, Nthabiseng Koloane, Mbali Nkuta, Nkhensani Nkhwashu, Thato Farirai, Patience Kweza, Thato Chidarikire, Simukai Shamu, Tendesayi Kufa, Adrian Puren, Neil Martinson, Minja Milovanovic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,396,882
of 25,525,181 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,277
of 17,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,485
of 361,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#215
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,525,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.