↓ Skip to main content

Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
44 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting
Published in
BioScience, April 2016
DOI 10.1093/biosci/biw038
Authors

Martine Maron, Christopher D. Ives, Heini Kujala, Joseph W. Bull, Fleur J. F. Maseyk, Sarah Bekessy, Ascelin Gordon, James E.M. Watson, Pia E. Lentini, Philip Gibbons, Hugh P. Possingham, Richard J. Hobbs, David A. Keith, Brendan A. Wintle, Megan C. Evans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 4 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 305 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 13%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Other 23 7%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 80 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 109 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 18%
Social Sciences 17 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 89 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#582,891
of 25,137,221 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#265
of 3,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,689
of 307,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,137,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.