| Title |
Drought and the rebound effect: a Murray–Darling Basin example
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-015-1705-y |
| Authors |
Adam Loch, David Adamson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 20% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 12% |
| Engineering | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#486,412
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#35
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,293
of 265,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.