↓ Skip to main content

No ergogenic effects of a 10-day combined heat and hypoxic acclimation on aerobic performance in normoxic thermoneutral or hot conditions

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
No ergogenic effects of a 10-day combined heat and hypoxic acclimation on aerobic performance in normoxic thermoneutral or hot conditions
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00421-019-04215-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandros Sotiridis, Panagiotis Miliotis, Urša Ciuha, Maria Koskolou, Igor B. Mekjavic

Abstract

Hypoxic acclimation enhances convective oxygen delivery to the muscles. Heat acclimation-elicited thermoregulatory benefits have been suggested not to be negated by adding daily exposure to hypoxia. Whether concomitant acclimation to both heat and hypoxia offers a synergistic enhancement of aerobic performance in thermoneutral or hot conditions remains unresolved. Eight young males ([Formula: see text]: 51.6 ± 4.6 mL min-1 kg-1) underwent a 10-day normobaric hypoxic confinement (FiO2 = 0.14) interspersed with daily 90-min normoxic controlled hyperthermia (target rectal temperature: 38.5 °C) exercise sessions. Prior to, and following the confinement, the participants conducted a 30-min steady-state exercise followed by incremental exercise to exhaustion on a cycle ergometer in thermoneutral normoxic (NOR), thermoneutral hypoxic (FiO2 = 0.14; HYP) and hot (35 °C, 50% relative humidity; HE) conditions in a randomized and counterbalanced order. The steady-state exercise was performed at 40% NOR peak power output (Wpeak) to evaluate thermoregulatory function. Blood samples were obtained from an antecubital vein before, on days 1 and 10, and the first day post-acclimation. [Formula: see text] and ventilatory thresholds were not modified in any environment following acclimation. Wpeak increased by 6.3 ± 3.4% in NOR and 4.0 ± 4.9% in HE, respectively. The magnitude and gain of the forehead sweating response were augmented in HE post-acclimation. EPO increased from baseline (17.8 ± 7.0 mIU mL-1) by 10.7 ± 8.8 mIU mL-1 on day 1 but returned to baseline levels by day 10 (15.7 ± 5.9 mIU mL-1). A 10-day combined heat and hypoxic acclimation conferred only minor benefits in aerobic performance and thermoregulation in thermoneutral or hot conditions. Thus, adoption of such a protocol does not seem warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Unspecified 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 19 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 12 27%
Unspecified 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 20 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,783,733
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,960
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,298
of 357,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#28
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.