↓ Skip to main content

Survival of neonates in rural Southern Tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Survival of neonates in rural Southern Tanzania: does place of delivery or continuum of care matter?
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-12-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rose Nathan, Mathew Alexander Mwanyangala

Abstract

The concept of continuum of care has recently been highlighted as a core principle of maternal, newborn and child health initiatives, and as a means to save lives. However, evidence has consistently revealed that access to care during and post delivery (intra and postpartum) remains a challenge in the continuum of care framework. In places where skilled delivery assistance is exclusively available in health facilities, access to health facilities is critical to the survival of the mother and her newborn. However, little is known about the association of place of delivery and survival of neonates. This paper uses longitudinal data generated in a Health and Demographic Surveillance System in rural Southern Tanzania to assess associations of neonatal mortality and place of delivery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Unknown 115 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 24%
Student > Master 25 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 33%
Social Sciences 23 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 17 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2012.
All research outputs
#17,656,184
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,298
of 4,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,236
of 160,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.