| Title |
Silica-Lipid Hybrid (SLH) Versus Non-lipid Formulations for Optimising the Dose-Dependent Oral Absorption of Celecoxib
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-011-0458-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angel Tan, Andrew K. Davey, Clive A. Prestidge |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Researcher | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,714,138
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#492
of 2,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,974
of 109,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.