| Title |
Using Best-Worst Scaling Choice Experiments to Measure Public Perceptions and Preferences for Healthcare Reform in Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/11539660-000000000-00000 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordan J. Louviere, Terry N. Flynn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 22 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,109,576
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#236
of 591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,971
of 187,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#13
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.