↓ Skip to main content

Two-handed tangible interaction techniques for composing augmented blocks

Overview of attention for article published in Virtual Reality, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Two-handed tangible interaction techniques for composing augmented blocks
Published in
Virtual Reality, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10055-010-0163-9
Authors

Hyeongmook Lee, Mark Billinghurst, Woontack Woo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 3%
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 69 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 28%
Student > Master 15 20%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 33 43%
Engineering 11 14%
Design 8 11%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 7 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,478,822
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Virtual Reality
#123
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,141
of 96,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virtual Reality
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them