| Title |
Transcatheter Versus Medical Treatment of Patients With Symptomatic Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maurizio Taramasso, Giovanni Benfari, Pieter van der Bijl, Hannes Alessandrini, Adrian Attinger-Toller, Luigi Biasco, Philipp Lurz, Daniel Braun, Eric Brochet, Kim A Connelly, Sabine de Bruijn, Paolo Denti, Florian Deuschl, Rodrigo Estevez-Loureiro, Neil Fam, Christian Frerker, Mara Gavazzoni, Jörg Hausleiter, Edwin Ho, Jean-Michel Juliard, Ryan Kaple, Christian Besler, Susheel Kodali, Felix Kreidel, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Azeem Latib, Alexander Lauten, Vanessa Monivas, Michael Mehr, Guillem Muntané-Carol, Tamin Nazif, Georg Nickening, Giovanni Pedrazzini, François Philippon, Alberto Pozzoli, Fabien Praz, Rishi Puri, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Ulrich Schäfer, Joachim Schofer, Horst Sievert, Gilbert H L Tang, Holger Thiele, Yan Topilsky, Karl-Philipp Rommel, Victoria Delgado, Alec Vahanian, Ralph Stephan Von Bardeleben, John G Webb, Marcel Weber, Stephan Windecker, Mirjam Winkel, Michel Zuber, Martin B Leon, Rebecca T Hahn, Jeroen J Bax, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Francesco Maisano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Colombia | 3 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 63% |
| Scientists | 11 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 17% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 23% |
| Unknown | 69 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 49% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 79 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#713,565
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,801
of 17,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,241
of 362,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#54
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.