↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of estimates of relative abundance from a weakly structured mass‐participation bird atlas survey and a robustly designed monitoring scheme

Overview of attention for article published in Ibis, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of estimates of relative abundance from a weakly structured mass‐participation bird atlas survey and a robustly designed monitoring scheme
Published in
Ibis, March 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2012.01229.x
Authors

JUDIT K. SZABO, RICHARD A. FULLER, HUGH P. POSSINGHAM

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 96 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 24%
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 41%
Environmental Science 43 40%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,090,466
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#2,637
of 3,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,201
of 172,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.