↓ Skip to main content

Endocannabinoids

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: Endocannabinoids
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Endocannabinoids
Chapter number 16
Book title
Endocannabinoids
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20825-1_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-920824-4, 978-3-31-920825-1
Authors

Velasco, Guillermo, Sánchez, Cristina, Guzmán, Manuel, Guillermo Velasco, Cristina Sánchez, Manuel Guzmán

Editors

Roger G. Pertwee

Abstract

A large body of evidence shows that cannabinoids, in addition to their well-known palliative effects on some cancer-associated symptoms, can reduce tumour growth in animal models of cancer. They do so by modulating key cell signalling pathways involved in the control of cancer cell proliferation and survival. In addition, cannabinoids inhibit angiogenesis and cell proliferation in different types of tumours in laboratory animals. By contrast, little is known about the biological role of the endocannabinoid system in cancer physio-pathology, and several studies suggest that it may be over-activated in cancer. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of cannabinoids as antitumour agents, focusing on recent advances in the molecular mechanisms of action, including resistance mechanisms and opportunities for combination therapy approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 26 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,141,538
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#79
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,610
of 353,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#14
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.