| Title |
Evaluation of liposomal clodronate for treatment of malignant histiocytosis in dogs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00262-009-0763-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott Hafeman, Cheryl London, Robyn Elmslie, Steven Dow |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 70 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 46% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 20 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,111,805
of 24,338,161 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#1,095
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,099
of 84,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,338,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.