You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
JCS 2017/JHFS 2017 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure ― Digest Version ―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-19-0342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroyuki Tsutsui, Mitsuaki Isobe, Hiroshi Ito, Hiroshi Ito, Ken Okumura, Minoru Ono, Masafumi Kitakaze, Koichiro Kinugawa, Yasuki Kihara, Yoichi Goto, Issei Komuro, Yoshikatsu Saiki, Yoshihiko Saito, Yasushi Sakata, Naoki Sato, Yoshiki Sawa, Akira Shiose, Wataru Shimizu, Hiroaki Shimokawa, Yoshihiko Seino, Koichi Node, Taiki Higo, Atsushi Hirayama, Miyuki Makaya, Tohru Masuyama, Toyoaki Murohara, Shin-Ichi Momomura, Masafumi Yano, Kenji Yamazaki, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Tsutomu Yoshikawa, Michihiro Yoshimura, Masatoshi Akiyama, Toshihisa Anzai, Shiro Ishihara, Takayuki Inomata, Teruhiko Imamura, Yu-Ki Iwasaki, Tomohito Ohtani, Katsuya Onishi, Takatoshi Kasai, Mahoto Kato, Makoto Kawai, Yoshiharu Kinugasa, Shintaro Kinugawa, Toru Kuratani, Shigeki Kobayashi, Yasuhiko Sakata, Atsushi Tanaka, Koichi Toda, Takashi Noda, Kotaro Nochioka, Masaru Hatano, Takayuki Hidaka, Takeo Fujino, Shigeru Makita, Osamu Yamaguchi, Uichi Ikeda, Takeshi Kimura, Shun Kohsaka, Masami Kosuge, Masakazu Yamagishi, Akira Yamashina |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 12 | 57% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 319 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 18% |
| Unknown | 149 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 167 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,756,984
of 25,542,788 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#114
of 2,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,896
of 352,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,542,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.