↓ Skip to main content

Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy

Overview of attention for article published in Research Policy, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
393 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy
Published in
Research Policy, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103865
Authors

Darcy W.E. Allen, Chris Berg, Brendan Markey-Towler, Mikayla Novak, Jason Potts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 393 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 15%
Student > Master 49 12%
Researcher 29 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Student > Bachelor 23 6%
Other 65 17%
Unknown 139 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 107 27%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 29 7%
Computer Science 27 7%
Engineering 24 6%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 151 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,756,053
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Research Policy
#340
of 2,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,948
of 470,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Policy
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.