↓ Skip to main content

Intersecting fields: The influence of proximate field dynamics on the development of electronic/dance music in the US and UK

Overview of attention for article published in Poetics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intersecting fields: The influence of proximate field dynamics on the development of electronic/dance music in the US and UK
Published in
Poetics, December 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101389
Authors

Rens Wilderom, Alex van Venrooij

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 19%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 4 25%
Social Sciences 3 19%
Arts and Humanities 2 13%
Psychology 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,992,281
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Poetics
#208
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,451
of 480,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Poetics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them